- Posts: 17
- Thank you received: 1
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
levyte357 wrote: Well done Xmax, smiley32
Didn't you put these pics up in the Amp Internals Thread on SP? What happened to them?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
What are the main differences between yours and the Inf8Mk2
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
NITZ V1505 wrote: I thought that the amp had 32 caps as stated by xmax. No matter though 36 is better!!!!! The only thing is having the bridge sitting on top of the caps or is it separated from the tops of the caps?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
levyte357 wrote: Kanwar, "I think" you mentioned something previously about why more smoothing, transistors, transformer capacity is needed to support driving low impedance reactive loads vs purely resistive loads on test bench...
What was that? ( Think it was deleted from somewhere, for some reason...)
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
levyte357 wrote: EDIT:Did you also mention manufacturer recommended transistor count per channel, for TO-220 for specific output power ?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Kanwar wrote:
levyte357 wrote: EDIT:Did you also mention manufacturer recommended transistor count per channel, for TO-220 for specific output power ?
If we look at Max allowable continuous current rating of TO-220 package pins, its not more than 35A [Provided IDS rating of silicon is well above this limit]
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.