Cubo 18:
Cubo 18 is a multi purpose, stand alone bass bin that, like Cubo 15, will equal or out run a single 18" BR*, of similar size, from ~ 40 Hz and up in terms of sensitivity. Cubo 18 works with a wide variety of 18” drivers. It has a cut list from just over a single 18 mm*** sheet (244 x 122 cm) / (8' x 4') with a single angled cut. Cubo 18" realizes a cost effective, small and light weight enclosure following the KISS-principle.
Development:
In 2007 the first prototype was build and tested. Cubo 18" is the 5th prototype in a line of hybrids aiming at the achievements as stated above.  Cubo 18 Standard and Cubo 18 Extended will both work with a wide variety of drivers, if uncertain which one will be most suited, build Cubo 18 Extended or mail me at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Size: 62x62x65cm (HxWxD)    
Frequency: From 40 Hz up to 110 Hz    
Enclosure Type: Hybrid

3D Model (by K-M-Sound-System):

 
Footnotes: 18” drivers preferably with an EBP of 100 or higher; Fs (22-42 Hz), Qts (0.25 - 0.58), Vas (200 - 450 L) / (7.4 – 16.7 ft^3). Where EBP = Fs / Qts . Measurements will follow.
 
Cubo 18/15 (difference): Cubo 18 is 3 cm (/ 1 1/6th inch) deeper then Cubo 15. Due to phase similarities Cubo 18 and Cubo 15 can be  used together without noticeable issues. Cubo 18 has on average slightly more output for a given input in comparison with Cubo 15 (based upon electro-mechanical relatively similar drivers), especially between Fc high and Fc low,whilst Fc high and Fc low, remain similar (= cut-off frequency).
 
 
 
 Cubo 18: Front view
alt
 
Cubo 18: Side view without side panel
alt
 
Cubo 18: Driver for comparison
alt
 
Cubo 18: Detail magnet and bracing
alt
 
Cubo 18: Magnet facing out
alt
 
Cubo 18: Magnet in chamber
alt
alt
alt
alt
alt
 


Cubo15's Avatar
Cubo15 replied the topic: #24822 1 hour 20 minutes ago
Hi,

It wouldn't be my first choice to use the 2225H in Cubo Kick 18 but it can be done, it's Xmax is on the small side for Cubo 15 so Cubo 18 is abetter choice. If the 3 cm depth difference is that important you could add 3 cm to the front of Cubo Kick 15. Alternatively you could also use the 2240H in Cubo Kick 18.

Both 18's drivers are suited for Cubo 18 Extended. The 2242H will take the most power as it has plenty of Xmax, for the 2240H I would use a 40 Hz high pass and around 500 W of amplifier power as it's Xmax is somewhat limited.

Best regards Cubo
Andrew4566's Avatar
Andrew4566 replied the topic: #24821 1 day 18 hours ago
I am considering building a pair of either Cubo 15 or 18 and a corresponding pair of Cubo Kicks.

I own a number of three different JBL drivers and would like to utilize them if I can.

2225H/J 15"

FS: 40hz
QTS: .28
VAS: 170l

2240H 18"

FS: 30hz
QTS: .23
VAS: 489l

2242H 18"
FS: 35
QTS: .28
VAS: 283l

If the best solution is a Cubo 18... can a Cubo Kick 18 be used with the 2225 15" driver so that is matches size wise?

-Andy
Cubo15's Avatar
Cubo15 replied the topic: #24814 1 month 1 day ago
Is there a high pass filter set, if so at what frequency and how steep?

Typically the Kilomax will have more excursion in Cubo Sub than Cubo 18.
marco 101's Avatar
marco 101 replied the topic: #24813 1 month 3 days ago
the dimensions of my BR-box are almost equal to the cubo 18. Yes idd there is a crossover between and another processor that I can pretty much get away with. only found that I quickly reached the x-max of the kilomax in the BR.
think i was on 700rms.
Cubo15's Avatar
Cubo15 replied the topic: #24812 1 month 1 week ago
The Eminence kilomax is well suited for a reflex design, your cabinet doesn't seem extraordinarily large so excursion shouldn't be a problem, do you know the internal volume and tuning frequency? Also do you use a high pass filter to protect against over-excursion, if not that's where I would start.
Cubo 18 Standard will limit excursion compared to a reflex cabinet but will require a high pass to limit excursion below it's tuning frequency just like a reflex does.

Best regards Cubo
marco 101's Avatar
marco 101 replied the topic: #24811 1 month 1 week ago
So this disign is the best for the Eminence kilomax ? a have them in BR -design , nut the X-Max is to fast
Cubo15's Avatar
Cubo15 replied the topic: #24731 5 months 2 days ago
That is good to hear. Either listen to the standard setup or test in a practical setting with the method described above. Both the port of the reflex top and Cubo introduce a frequency dependent delay, if you're lucky those are the same at the crossover frequency of your choice and you won't need delay.

Best regards Cubo
ushakov1957's Avatar
ushakov1957 replied the topic: #24730 5 months 2 days ago
Good afternoon. Thanks for the detailed and detailed answer (I have an audio delay adjustment in the tops)! If the tops and the subwoofer are at the same distance from the listener and the speaker in the subwoofer is magnetically inserted in, then is there no need for a sound delay in the tops? Thank you
Cubo15's Avatar
Cubo15 replied the topic: #24729 5 months 3 days ago
I'm not sure if the Yahama has delay settings, if it has you're adjusting 33 cm of sound path difference for every millisecond of delay that you apply. Sound path differences depend on the exact design of the subs and tops but also spatial placement. The easiest way to set up delay is to play a sine wave, of the crossover frequency that you use, through your top and sub simultaneously. (in your case 70 or 100 Hz). This doesn't need to be played loud by the way.. If you reverse the polarity on the driver or switch the phase setting on your sub amp, the best delay is the setting that reduces output to a minimum. Meaning that if you use the normal polarity during use, the sub and top will have maximum output at the crossover frequency.

Placing the amplifier horizontally on the back wall of the subwoofer at the very bottom is the easiest solution, you might want to cover the electronics from the inside with some ply. You could also place the amplifier vertically but I would need stricter dimensions of the amplifier (including depth), as it will no doubt complicate things.

Best regards Cubo
ushakov1957's Avatar
ushakov1957 replied the topic: #24728 5 months 5 days ago
Thank you very much for your quick reply! I have 2 Yamaha DZR10 [ usa.yamaha.com/products/proaudio/speaker...r_dxs_xlf/specs.html ] tops and I use a built-in amplifier for cubo18 - board - B-52 ACT-18XV2 plate. What signal delay (ms) should I set in the tops? in what place in the box CUBO18 to embed - embed and put this amplifier - plate ACT-18VX2[ www.parts-express.com/act-18xv2-230v-amp...ifier-230v--299-2348 ] (my option is on the back wall of the subwoofer at the very bottom and placed horizontally) I'd like to hear your opinion. Appreciated in advance.
Cubo15's Avatar
Cubo15 replied the topic: #24727 5 months 5 days ago
For shortest decay I would try magnet inward and put a short delay on the tops (depending on the type).

I don't think the 18LW1400 is a 'short decay' kinda driver but the shortest decay I experienced with the 18LW1400 was with the magnet inward, in Cubo Sub.

Best regards Cubo
ushakov1957's Avatar
ushakov1957 replied the topic: #24726 5 months 5 days ago
Hi guys! going to use the 18LW1400 woofer in this expanded cube 18. What kind of woofer loading (magnet outward or magnet inward) is preferable for higher pressure work and, most importantly, punching bass, so that there is a powerful and short beat and then immediately decay? Thanks in advance
Nugget's Avatar
Nugget replied the topic: #24680 7 months 4 weeks ago
I am sorry for answering so late, i had holidays. Reason for the Cubo 15 ext. with bigger cutout was just that this one was already built and usable as a test cab.
I have not compared Cubo 18 to BR with the same driver, because both were measured by a friend who lives some 100 kms away from me. But i really do like my Cubo 15s with Kappa LFA. Because of the lower need of xmax, they tend to sound a little more effortless compared to BR. The other notable thing is the higher part of 2nd harmond distortion compared to 3rd, while measured BR gave more 3rd than 2nd. In my experience that leads to a "warmer" sound. Only downside is, that my Cubo 15 with Kappa LFA and the Cubo 15 ext. with Colossus both had -3db points at 47 hz which isn't too low. But it's right that they tend to "sound lower". The -3db Point on LF18N401 was about 43,5 hz btw.
Cubo15's Avatar
Cubo15 replied the topic: #24679 8 months 1 day ago
That sounds good, are you or when will you be able to give a sneak peek?
bee's Avatar
bee replied the topic: #24675 8 months 3 days ago
all good m8t, had ishues loggin in for a while, but ill try posting a bit more. Got a great free plan in the works, working along side mmj in the usa. proto should be finished in the next week.
Cubo15's Avatar
Cubo15 replied the topic: #24671 8 months 5 days ago
Measuring T/S-parameters is always wise, can also be done in REW if you can get it to work for you.  The V15-700n is used in a reflex and band pass bass cabinet, so that will typically mean it's either (most) suitable for Extended or Extra Extended.
Djspinback69's Avatar
Djspinback69 replied the topic: #24669 8 months 6 days ago
Found this on the internet posted on Amazon by Void. Apparently this is the driver from the Arcline x and the Basys system
Djspinback69's Avatar
Djspinback69 replied the topic: #24667 8 months 1 week ago
I’d also quite like to have a go at measuring the T/S parameters of them
Djspinback69's Avatar
Djspinback69 replied the topic: #24666 8 months 1 week ago
It’s not something I’ve done before but keen to give it a go and see how they perform vs my fane reflex cabs and the fane in the Cubo’s

ive attached a couple more pics of the driver. The cone is really rigid
Cubo15's Avatar
Cubo15 replied the topic: #24665 8 months 1 week ago
I use REW (Room EQ Wiizard) nowadays for measuring, never tried it on Mac but the OS is supported. If you haven't used the V15-700n yet, the low frequency response tends to approve in the first ~10 hours of use.

@Bee: Good to see you're still around! How's life?

Cubo
Djspinback69's Avatar
Djspinback69 replied the topic: #24664 8 months 1 week ago
It’s definitely not a V1000 it’s 15” it’s a V15-700n which is the driver out of something like a Arcline 2 x 15” not sure on the cab I used to be able to find it on Google but not now
bee's Avatar
bee replied the topic: #24663 8 months 1 week ago
do you no what void driver model it is. the  v1000 is the most common. A few others do exist.
Djspinback69's Avatar
Djspinback69 replied the topic: #24657 8 months 1 week ago
That’s great, thanks for taking the time to reply to me. It’s very much appreciated. That’s pretty much what I was thinking. I’ve attached a pic of the void driver screwed into my mdf test cab. Can’t tell you much about it other than it looks like a neo driver, the cone looks very stiff and it looks like it means business and I’m sure it’s 700W will be an interesting experiment. I’ve just bought a measurement mic and a interface for my MacBook so if I can work out how I’ll take some readings??
other than that I think I’ll order an RCF driver and A/B them all 
Cubo15's Avatar
Cubo15 replied the topic: #24654 8 months 1 week ago
I've had some great reviews from people using drivers like the LF18N401, it does give a bit smoother response than the Prime and a slowly rising response. Lower efficiency drivers like the Prime really need some power to get loose in my experience. The extra Xmax of the Prime does allow a bit of EQ, typically in the 40 - 65 Hz region.

IIRC Nugget did first build a Cubo 15 Extended and based on simulation Cubo 18 only drops 3 Hz lower then Cubo 15, he's not the first to convert a Cubo 15 to Cubo 18 that way.

AFAIK Void only released 2 or 3 drivers for the DIY-community, all their other drivers are strictly for their own cabinets, it's unlikely you'll find T/S-parameters for them. That makes it hard to say how they'll perform in Cubo 15, although they will have to be pretty weird not to work and considering we're talking Void Acoustics here I'm pretty sure they'll be quality drivers.

Cubo
Djspinback69's Avatar
Djspinback69 replied the topic: #24653 8 months 1 week ago

Cubo15 wrote: Djspinback69 Well, I wasn't going to show the measurements but was pretty much going to answer based on those measurements.

Nugget How did you like the sound of your 'Cubo 18's' compared to the reflex?

Cubo


I am a bit confused by your reply Cubo, I haven’t asked for any measurements only guidance with driver choice